Free At Last

I finally got the rest of my gear out of the psychotic witches house, well that whish ahe gave up freely.

I've been enjoying the past few days total freedom and the fact her time driving the agenda and time table is now at an end. I am now in the driving seat and the task of recovering stolen monwy begins. Tgis is being done on multiple fronts. 

Got to laugh

It looks like whoever my ex had tbrown herself at has got cold feat or no busineess sense.
Any market street trader will tell ypu times have been tough the last few years with many falling by the wayside only to be replaced with a stream of wannabees who  rarely last the year.
Ruth is a wannabee. She got it in her head back in May to run a market stall. Aside from economic conditions being against her there was a fundamental flaw with her plan.
She forgot that her primary goal was to shift product to make enough to live. The flaw in Ruths choice, kids retro toys and easy reader and activity books,, will be obvious to most. The stall is beavily reliant on young kids. If she c the ouldnt make a living profit durng  summer when all the kids are off school she never would. As soon as the kids went back to school a massive chunk oc ber market is gone.
We split weeks ago,  while obvious dhe to lies and disappearances over night, the final breaking point was theft of a large sum of money to subsidise this loss making venture buying a van. Maybe she thought looking like a real trader might help. In truth as the van cant vet the kids out of school or change the weather or increase the footfall through the market. What it did do was increase overheads keeping two vechicles. The only benefit to ruth was the ability to carry two days stock so she could play away over night. The inault being she was using money stolen from me to throw herself at anyone she thought could help her or be her meal ticket.

Why laugh? Well i have to laugh at something. Im disabled, now homeless after i rwised the full extent of ber thieving.
Many (mostly women) have queationed my assumption it was a guy she threw herswlf at  but the sex of her potential meal ticket is immaterial.

What is funny is that male or female it looks like at best this person is an idiot but far more likely as disengenuous and as insincere as she is.

It is clear from the bad advice given that this person was after no strings fun with a here today gone tomorrow wannabee. It seems to be dawning on him/her that ruth throwing herself at them she was after a meal tixket, a new wallet to plunder and would of had a shock at her making her diaa led partner homeless and inxrwaaingly aware of her lack of money sense.

It seems they want to increase space between them by hastening her demise.

Expand they say.. The extra tables bought will either overflow a 10x10 pitch or fill all covered space so she and the books get wet.

Ruth has poor spacial awareness and wont realise unril she tries to set up. If she hasnt already she will end up expanding her pitch size increasing overheads. She then has to has additional product items to fill the space. While she has plenty of poorly selected product lines that havnt sold. There is one thing in rotating stock so some of tbe poor sellers are on display but  no point in filling all the space with it. So new lines added along with a propor3tion if more poor sellers.

This dumb advice is obvious to hasten hef demise as it increases overheads with stock and inevitable increased pitch costs all at a tims wbdn footfall is decreasing and cant get the kids out of school.

Backing Blair NOT!

Ive Just stumbled upn a site Backing Blair
Rather than backing Blair, the site is more concerned with giving him and his government a good kicking at the election.

While this aim is in itself a worthy and admirable cause, I find that I must question the site's motives.

The site proposes that people vote tactically to remove current labour MPs, the justification being that blair's is a right wing government.
It seems that the left have swallowed the big lie that blair is right wing.

For the benefit of middle England voters, Blair might talk right wing, but if you actually look at what his government does or the effects of its policies they are not only Left wing, but they are as disasterous to the British economy as any Previous labour government.

But hey,forget their reasoning, I support their aim so here is the link avain Backing Blair

US Fuel prices

Here in the UK some of the UK orientated 24hr news channels overnight show the evening news from a partner network in the states, Sky show CBS and the BBC carry ABC.

I ve just sat through yet another news story on CBS of americans whinging about sky high fuel prices and complaining that prices had reached $2.11 a gallon

They never point out that viewers should spare a thought for those unlucky enough to live in Europe, especially the UK where fuel and thus the economy are artificially crippled by sky high fuel taxes

We pay £0.85 (UK pounds) a litre for regular unleaded.yet US residents scream think USD$2.11 is outrageous. They should be reminded how lucky they are not to be paying $6.08 per US gallon and thank god that they dont live under a socialist regime willing to cripple their economy in such a way and how lucky they are to be an American.

Eye On The Left

Eye On The Left

Michael Jackson Charges = UK Protest Coverup

With world attention and global headlines turned towards the protests in the United Kingdom and the FTAA in Miami, suddenly a new scandal erupts for Amerikan corporate media to waste the public's time with: "authorities have issued an arrest warrant for Michael Jackson on multiple counts of child molestation." This debacle pales in comparison to the thousands of dead Iraqi children murdered by bLiar and the chimp. What amazing timing! Meanwhile, the world awaits the arrest of some real war criminals: Bush and Blair.

DonDilly Says
Well It didnt take long for the donkey jacketed leftwing layabouts to come up with a conspiracy theory as to why they are not headline news.

The left should stop trying to accuse the american right of using left wing tactics.
they should first remember the tactics of their own neo marxist leader Blair who did all in his power to suppress protest coverage' during Jang's 1999 visit. Or for that matter the blatent attempt to Bury bad news on 9/11

BBC NEWS | UK | How to protect a president abroad

How to protect a president abroad
DonDilly Says I have nothing against Bush, but I do find this visit to have pretty poor timing. It smacks of Blair and Bush assuming that by now the Saddam issue would be done and dusted turning the trip up the stars and stripes and union jack covered mall into something akin to a victory procession.

That aside, I think the level of security is way over the top, especially some of the USSS demands. Mysteriously central London webcams have gone offline There are even reports that they wanted a mobile phone blackout in central London for the duration of the visit. This rightly was fought by the phone companies. I don't see what could be gained by such a move. OK protesters use mobile phones to coordinate their movements and more importantly terrorists could potentially use them to trigger an explosive device. Mobiles are only one way of triggering a device. WiFi technology could be used or even Bluetooth for that matter, but as the explosive device would not be passive I would suspect such a device would stick out like a sore thumb in RF sweeps of the area. However with the likes of CBS news reporting that in Iraq troops are being attacked with remote detonated devices with remote triggers using $100 remotes for automatic garage doors it shows how pointless (not to mention disruptive) a phone blackout would be.

They should pay more attention to more fundamental security breaches like a protester climimbing the palace railings or the latest breach, a newpaper reporter had scammed his way into the palace and been working undercover as a footman for two months only coming clean the morning he was due to serve Bush his Breakfast.

On a final note, something no one else seems to have commented on. With 15000 British police being drafted in specifically for Bush's security, who is guarding us?, the criminal fraternity in outer London and the home Counties are going to think that Christmashas come early.

Times Online - Newspaper Edition

Times Online - Black and Asian PCs 'treated too leniently'


DonDilly Says An Excellent story in the Times giving yet another example of institutionalized racism in the British Police force against WHITE officers.

It is bad enough that senior police officers, like any employer or line manager in Britain these days is scared stiff of reprimand employees from ethnic groups incase they try playing the race card, mainly because the race tribunals sense of justice is skewed to such an extent that the employer is practically guilty until proven innocent, with the burden of proof on the employer to show that there was no racial motive. In other words prove a negative.


The details given in the Times story are even more disturbing however as it details claims that senior officers are actually being pressurized into treating black and asian officers more leniently than their white counterparts. Full marks to Superintendent Peter Schofield, of the Greater Manchester Police’s for making a formal complaint on the issue. I am waiting to see how long it takes the left to label this officer with legitimate concerns a racist merely for pointing out the inequality of what they are doing.

Panto dropped in racism fear

BBC NEWS

DonDilly Says

Excuse me, but what has Snow White and the 7 Asylum Seekers got to go with racism???.

In reality 'Asylum Seeker' is a euphemism pushed on us by the politically correct left wing trendy Wendys for what everyone else calls illegal immigrants. In the good old days, a legitimate refugee fleeing persecution would be happy to get in to the nearest safe country and content in the knowledge that they did not have far to go home if or when the danger had lapsed. Now we have a situation where they travel through many safe countries, coming right across Europe to get here. These are not asylum seekers but welfare shoppers looking for the best deal they can get without any contribution from themselves.

The Left wing are good at screaming Racist any time someone complains about asylum seekers flooding the country. But the truth is it has nothing to do with race. If anything it has bought the different ethnic groups in the UK together in agreement that enough is enough. I don't care if they are black, white or green with purple spots, I don't want them here.

Put into context. The UK is a small island slightly smaller than Oregon (one of the smaller US states) yet at over 60 million, has a population between a fifth and a quarter of the entire USA. This little island only has finite resources as our ridiculously high property prices bare out.

With the space problems in the UK we should have some of the strictest immigration in the world as we should be worried about where to put our own growing population, rather than opening the floodgates to 200,000 illegal immigrants a year.